Abstract

This article contends that the open source data access policy adopted by the International HapMap Project, a large-scale, publicly funded genomic database, fails to protect against the dangers of parasitic patenting, the filing of patent applications that block other users' access to the data. The Article analyzes the shortcomings of the HapMap Project's open source policy and proposes an alternative that preserves some features of the open source approach while providing additional protection against parasitic patenting. Part 2 provides a brief background on the aims and data access policy of the HapMap Project. Part 3 describes the shortcomings of the HapMap data access policy. Part 4 then proposes an alternative data access policy that preserves some features of the open source approach while also providing enhanced protection against parasitic patenting.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.