Abstract
PurposeBiophysical tissue models are increasingly used in the interpretation of diffusion MRI (dMRI) data, with the potential to provide specific biomarkers of brain microstructural changes. However, it has been shown recently that, in the general Standard Model, parameter estimation from dMRI data is ill‐conditioned even when very high b‐values are applied. We analyze this issue for the Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging with Diffusivity Assessment (NODDIDA) model and demonstrate that its extension from single diffusion encoding (SDE) to double diffusion encoding (DDE) resolves the ill‐posedness for intermediate diffusion weightings, producing an increase in accuracy and precision of the parameter estimation.MethodsWe analyze theoretically the cumulant expansion up to fourth order in b of SDE and DDE signals. Additionally, we perform in silico experiments to compare SDE and DDE capabilities under similar noise conditions.ResultsWe prove analytically that DDE provides invariant information non‐accessible from SDE, which makes the NODDIDA parameter estimation injective. The in silico experiments show that DDE reduces the bias and mean square error of the estimation along the whole feasible region of 5D model parameter space.ConclusionsDDE adds additional information for estimating the model parameters, unexplored by SDE. We show, as an example, that this is sufficient to solve the previously reported degeneracies in the NODDIDA model parameter estimation.
Highlights
Diffusion MRI has been established as an invaluable tool for characterizing brain microstructure in vivo and non‐invasively
This paper extends NODDIDA to a double diffusion encoding (DDE) scheme and assesses the accuracy of estimators based on single diffusion encoding (SDE) and DDE measurements
Our work shows that modifying the diffusion MRI pulse sequence can mitigate the degeneracy on NODDIDA’s parameter estimation
Summary
Diffusion MRI (dMRI) has been established as an invaluable tool for characterizing brain microstructure in vivo and non‐invasively. NODDI’s assumptions have been shown to be incompatible with data from spherical tensor encoding (STE) in Lampinen et al[15] and it has been argued to introduce bias in the estimation of the remaining model parameters.[16] To overcome this limitation, Jelescu et al[17] extended the model by adding the diffusivities to the estimation routine, and removing the CSF compartment. They dubbed it NODDIDA (NODDI with Diffusivity Assessment). It was trained on simulated data with the prior assumption of similar traces for the intra‐ and extra‐axonal diffusivities
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.