Abstract

Geopolymer binder is expected to be an optimum alternative to Portland cement due to its excellent engineering properties of high strength, acid corrosion resistance, low permeability, good chemical resistance, and excellent fire resistance. To study the sulfuric acid corrosion resistance of geopolymer concrete (GPC) with different binding materials and concentrations of sodium hydroxide solution (NaOH), metakaolin, high-calcium fly ash, and low-calcium fly ash were chosen as binding materials of GPC for the geopolymerization process. A mixture of sodium silicate solution (Na2SiO3) and NaOH solution with different concentrations (8 M and 12 M) was selected as the alkaline activator with a ratio (Na2SiO3/NaOH) of 1.5. GPC specimens were immersed in the sulfuric acid solution with the pH value of 1 for 6 days and then naturally dried for 1 day until 98 days. The macroscopic properties of GPC were characterized by visual appearance, compressive strength, mass loss, and neutralization depth. The materials were characterized by SEM, XRD, and FTIR. The results indicated that at the immersion time of 28 d, the compressive strength of two types of fly ash-based GPC increased to some extent due to the presence of gypsum, but this phenomenon was not observed in metakaolin-based GPC. After 98 d of immersion, the residual strength of fly ash based GPC was still higher, which reached more than 25 MPa, while the metakaolin-based GPC failed. Furthermore, due to the rigid 3D networks of aluminosilicate in fly ash-based GPC, the mass of all GPC decreased slightly during the immersion period, and then tended to be stable in the later period. On the contrary, in metakaolin-based GPC, the incomplete geopolymerization led to the compressive strength being too low to meet the application of practical engineering. In addition, the compressive strength of GPC activated by 12 M NaOH was higher than the GPC activated by 8 M NaOH, which is owing to the formation of gel depended on the concentration of alkali OH ion, low NaOH concentration weakened chemical reaction, and reduced compressive strength. Additionally, according to the testing results of neutralization depth, the neutralization depth of high-calcium fly ash-based GPC activated by 12 M NaOH suffered acid attack for 98 d was only 6.9 mm, which is the minimum value. Therefore, the best performance was observed in GPC prepared with high-calcium fly ash and 12 M NaOH solution, which is attributed to gypsum crystals that block the pores of the specimen and improve the microstructure of GPC, inhibiting further corrosion of sulfuric acid.

Highlights

  • Concrete durability refers to the resistance of concrete against the action of aggressive environmental media which threaten the normal service of concrete components [1]

  • The high calcium fly ash was Class-C, and its content of CaO was more than 10%

  • According to the types of binding materials and concentrations of NaOH, the geopolymer concrete (GPC) specimens prepared with low-calcium and high-calcium fly ash and metakaolin were marked as F-8, F-12, C-8, C-12, MK-8, and MK-12 respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Concrete durability refers to the resistance of concrete against the action of aggressive environmental media which threaten the normal service of concrete components [1]. Nuaklong et al [24] used metakaolin as a partial substitution for high-calcium fly ash in geopolymer binders and concluded that the mixed binders exhibited higher resistance to acid attacks than the single binder due to the decline of calcium content of mixtures. Mehta et al [25] investigated the sulfuric acid resistance of high-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete blended with an additional calcium source (OPC). It is significant to investigate the sulfuric-acid resistance of geopolymers respectively prepared from different binding materials: metakaolin and low-calcium and high-calcium fly ash. The work reported aimed to clarify the effects of different binding materials and concentrations of alkali activators of GPC on the sulfuric acid corrosion resistance. SEM, XRD, and FTIR were selected to analyze the mechanism of acid corrosion resistance for GPC

Raw Materials
Mix Proportions and Preparation of Specimens
F-8 F-12 C-8 C-12 MK-8 MK-12
Visual Appearance
Neutralization Depth
Compressive Strength
X-ray Diffraction
C12 F8 F12 MK8 MK12
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.