Abstract

Age is a primary risk factor for a number of chronic diseases including mobility disability, cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and cancer. Most physical activity guidelines emphasize the performance of 150 min of moderate-to-vigorous or 75 min of vigorous aerobic exercise training (AET) weekly for reduction of chronic disease risk. Nonetheless, there is an emerging body of evidence showing that resistance exercise training (RET) appears to be as effective as AET in reducing risk of several chronic diseases. It may also be that RET is more effective than AET in some regards; the converse is likely also true. We posit that the perceived divergent exercise mode-dependent health benefits of AET and RET are likely small in most cases. In this short review, our aim is to examine evidence of associations between the performance of RET and chronic health disease risk (mobility disability, T2D, CVD, cancer). We also postulate on how RET may be influencing chronic disease risk and how it is a critical component for healthy aging. Accumulating evidence points to RET as a potent and robust preventive strategy against a number of chronic diseases traditionally associated with the performance of AET, but evidence favors RET as a potent countermeasure against declines in mobility. On the basis of this review we propose that the promotion of RET should assume a more prominent position in exercise guidelines particularly for older persons.

Highlights

  • Cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are leading causes of morbidity and mortality in older adults aged 65 years and older (Roth et al, 2015; Tanday, 2016)

  • A common misconception is that Resistance exercise (RE) training (RET) and aerobic exercise (AE) training (AET) result in separate health benefits, but we propose this is an artifact of the greater volume of data that currently exists for aerobic exercise training (AET) as opposed to resistance exercise training (RET)

  • AET reduces the risk of CVD and mortality (Yusuf et al, 2004; O’Donnell et al, 2016), and as a result has been the focus of lifestyle interventions targeting these ailments

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are leading causes of morbidity and mortality in older adults aged 65 years and older (Roth et al, 2015; Tanday, 2016). The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date evidencebased narrative review of the efficacy of RET in combating chronic health disease (mobility disability, T2D, CVD, and cancer) risk in older adults. To achieve this aim, we summarize data derived predominantly from humans, but will draw upon important findings from preclinical disease models to substantiate our arguments and provide additional mechanistic insight not available in human observational trials

RESISTANCE EXERCISE TRAINING AND PHYSICAL MOBILITY
RESISTANCE EXERCISE TRAINING AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE
RESISTANCE EXERCISE TRAINING AND CANCER
Immune function
Findings
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call