Abstract

US ports and container/intermodal terminals are critical links in the marine transportation system. Disruption at a port can have a crippling economic effect in the coastal zone as well as the rest of the nation. Port stakeholders have a vested interest in the long-term function and viability of ports, but no standardized measures for performance or resilience exist for ports. The goal of this research is to demonstrate the utility of a predictive port resilience assessment tool. The developed tool encompasses a microscopic traffic simulation model (VISSIM) based hybrid multimodal analyzes of port operations and provides a quantifiable assessment of resilience. The application of this tool is shown on six ports in the Southeast US. The waterside port simulation models were developed using vessel automatic identification system data and programed within a VISSIM simulation of landside operations. This hybrid modeling approach was used to visualize vessels and allow them to interact in both time and space with each other and landside infrastructure. Local and regional resilience was quantified through the analysis of time-dependent resilience plots and used as a performance measure in this study. The utility of the predictive port resilience assessment was demonstrated in response to Hurricane Matthew (2016). However, the novel procedure described herein can be applied to any port hazard. This research grows the understanding of the regional consequences of hurricane events and enhances the knowledge in the development of a stakeholder-focused tool to assess resilience.

Highlights

  • The National Academies define resilience as “the ability to prepare and plan for, absorb, recover from, or more successfully adapt to actual or potential adverse events” (National Research Council (NRC), 2012)

  • The goal of this research was to demonstrate the utility of a port resilience assessment tool

  • The utility of the predictive port resilience assessment was demonstrated in response to Hurricane Matthew

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The National Academies define resilience as “the ability to prepare and plan for, absorb, recover from, or more successfully adapt to actual or potential adverse events” (National Research Council (NRC), 2012). Resilient infrastructure provides the means to deliver the essential goods and supplies needed to safely and quickly recover from a storm, attack, or other major disruption. Resilient ports help to create a shorter disruptive period and a faster time to recovery. There is a need to better understand the relationship between port operations, disruptions, and resilience. Quantitative methods and tools, stemming from engineering science and vulnerability studies, provide quick assessments of “resilience” at broad spatial scales, but do not dip below the surface into local scale, place-based, community resilience. Qualitative methods, on the other hand, help answer research questions that cannot be addressed with numerical data and dive into questions of attitude, perception, and social interaction

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.