Abstract
Cities face unprecedented demographic, environmental, economic, social, and spatial challenges. In recent years, the implementation of nature-based solutions (NBS) is becoming more relevant in cities to improve urban resilience and to cope with climate change. NBS represent cost effective solutions that simultaneously provide environmental, social, and economic benefits and help build resilience. A comprehensive and multi-dimension Resilience Assessment Framework (RAF) to evaluate the NBS contribution to urban resilience, focused on NBS for stormwater management and control, was developed. This RAF is aligned with the RESCCUE RAF and the main assessment frameworks focused on NBS and urban resilience. This RAF for NBS is driven by the definition of resilience objectives and is able to evaluate short- and long-term changes, considering a comprehensive definition of the urban resilience and addressing the environmental, social, and economic capabilities. Regarding the initial resilience maturity and the available information in the city, three analysis degrees were proposed for the RAF application, namely, the essential, complementary, and comprehensive degrees, for which a pre-defined selection of metrics is proposed. This paper aims to present the application of the RAF essential analysis degree and its extensive validation regarding cities with different resilience maturity and available information. The application to seven cities with different resilience and NBS challenges allowed an in-depth validation of the pre-defined metrics included in the RAF essential analysis. In this sense, the analysis of the resilience maturity of the participating cities is presented, the main challenges and consolidated aspects in the cities are identified, and the cities ready to apply the complementary analysis degree are recognized. To conclude, to validate the essential analysis degree, the assessment of the main requirements of the RAF for NBS are verified, based on the RAF metrics results for the cities. In this light, the main requirements of the RAF for NBS were aggregated in three main categories, namely, NBS aspects, resilience capabilities, and the performance, risk and cost analysis.
Highlights
Over the last decade, the emergence of the urban resilience and nature-based solutions (NBS) concepts has offered the opportunity to deal with the current challenges in cities from a sustainable and resource efficient perspective
This paper aims to present the application of the Resilience Assessment Framework (RAF) essential analysis degree to the participating cities and to validate its application regarding cities with different resilience maturity and available information
A comprehensive and multi-dimension RAF to evaluate the contribution of NBS to urban resilience was developed in [20], focused on NBS for stormwater management and control
Summary
The emergence of the urban resilience and nature-based solutions (NBS) concepts has offered the opportunity to deal with the current challenges in cities from a sustainable and resource efficient perspective. Building resilience represents a crucial challenge for governments and organizations [1], clearly identified and supported by the global long-term agendas, such as the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, the New Urban Agenda 2030, or the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. NBS can be defined as living solutions inspired by, continuously supported by, and using nature, which are designed to address several societal challenges from a resource-efficient perspective and to provide economic and environmental benefits simultaneously [11]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
