Resilience after Flight: Perspectives of Refugees and Supporting Practice Actors

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

The study aims to identify (aim 1) and relate (aim 2) refugees' and practice actors' perspectives on resilience after a flight to broaden the depth of understanding of postflight resilience and to provide insights into relationships between practice actors and refugees. Three guideline-based focus groups with refugees (N=9) and practice actors (N=13) to assess the perspectives of both groups on resilience after flight were conducted in German. They were analyzed iteratively according to Constructionist Grounded Theory. Refugees and practitioners report the strains of uncertainty and limitation, the adaptation processes of commonality and endeavor, and the adaptation goals of stability, connectedness, and positive emotionality (goal 1). The statements of refugees and supporting practice actors on resilience after flight concur strongly regarding their content and complement each other. Refugees report more individualized and more specifically than practice actors (goal 2). The aspects of resilience mentioned by refugees and supporting practitioners replicate the results of previous qualitative studies on post-flight resilience conducted with refugees. Both the strain of partly not knowing adequate adaptation options locally and attempts to create resilience-promoting conditions seem to be specific to the resilience of refugees. The content-related similarities between refugees and practice actors might stem from experiences of the practice actors in the context of support processes or from similar life experiences of the practice actors. The less individualized approach to post-flight resilience of the practice actors may be caused by a higher level of abstraction, role expectations, or coping with emotional distress. The results of the study suggest that refugee resilience is characterized by universal and population-specific aspects. That practice actors who support refugees and refugees concur on the content of post-refugee resilience validates the findings of previous qualitative studies on post-refugee resilience. The study also identified different approaches to post-flight resilience among refugees and practitioners, whose causes require further research.