Residual HIV-1 replication may impact immune recovery in patients on first-line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy.

Abstract

Antiretroviral combination therapy raises issues of long-term adherence and toxicity. Initial treatment simplification based on single-drug therapy was investigated in the MONARK trial, which compared first-line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy (arm A) with first-line lopinavir/ritonavir + zidovudine/lamivudine tritherapy (arm B). The MONARK trial is registered as a randomized trial at clinical trials.gov under identifier NCT 00234923. Immune recovery was compared in patients with undetectable plasma virus (<50 copies/mL) after 60 weeks of treatment (arm A, n = 21; arm B, n = 13). The week 60 CD4 T cell count and CD4 T cell subset distribution did not differ significantly between the treatment arms. Memory CD4 T cell responses to HIV and recall antigens were better with triple therapy than with monotherapy. The frequencies of activated CD8 T cells and anti-HIV CD8 T cell effector responses were similar in the two arms. However, the repertoire of CD8 T cell effector responses was broader and persistent residual viraemia more frequent (by ultrasensitive PCR) in the monotherapy arm. While viral control can be achieved with first-line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy, the quality of immune recovery is inferior to that obtained with triple therapy, possibly owing to a higher level of residual viral replication. Thus, the benefits of first-line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy in terms of toxicity and adherence might be offset by an increased risk of residual viral replication, which may also fuel latent viral reservoirs.