Abstract

IntroductionIn previous studies, protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy has shown trends for higher low-level elevations in HIV-1 RNA compared to triple therapy, but no increase in the risk of drug resistance.MethodsA total of 273 patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for over 24 weeks on current antiretrovirals switched to DRV/r (darunavir/ritonavir) 800/100 mg once-daily, either as monotherapy (n=137) or with 2NRTIs (nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors) (n=136), after a 4 week run-in phase with DRV/r + 2NRTI. Treatment failure was defined as HIV-1 RNA levels above 50 copies/mL (FDA Snapshot method) by Week 48, or switches off study treatment. Patients with elevations in HIV-1 RNA on DRV/r monotherapy could be re-intensified with NRTIs. The trial had 80% power to show non-inferiority for the monotherapy arm (delta = − 12%).ResultsPatients were 83% male and 87% Caucasian, with mean age 42 years; 10% were HCV antibody positive. In the DRV/r monotherapy arm, there were more patients with nadir CD4 count below 200 cells/µL (30% versus 22%). In the primary efficacy analysis, HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL by Week 48 (intent-to-treat (ITT)) was 118/137 (86.1%) in the DRV/r monotherapy arm versus 129/136 (94.9%) in the triple therapy arm; DRV/r monotherapy did not show non-inferiority versus triple therapy in the primary analysis (difference=− 8.7%, 95% CI −15.5 to −1.8%). In the multivariate analysis, the main predictor of treatment failure was nadir CD4 count. For patients with nadir CD4 counts <200 cells/µL, HIV-1 RNA suppression rates at Week 48 were 27/41 (66%) in the DRV/r monotherapy arm and 29/30 (97%) in the triple therapy arm; for patients with CD4 nadir at least 200 cells/µL, HIV-1 RNA suppression rates were 91/96 (95%) in the DRV/r monotherapy arm and 100/106 (94%) in the triple therapy arm. In the overall population, by a switch included analysis, efficacy was 92.0% versus 96.3%, showing non-inferiority (difference=− 4.3%, 95% CI=−9.7 to +1.2%). No treatment-emergent primary PI mutations were detected in three patients with sustained elevations in HIV-1 RNA at least 400 copies/mL (two on PI monotherapy, one on triple therapy). CD4 counts remained stable during the trial in both arms.ConclusionsIn this study for patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at baseline, switching to DRV/r monotherapy showed lower efficacy versus triple antiretroviral therapy at Week 48 in the primary switch equals failure analysis (86% versus 95%). However, this lower efficacy was seen mainly in patients with CD4 nadir levels below 200 cells/µL. There was no development of PI resistance.

Highlights

  • In previous studies, protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy has shown trends for higher low-level elevations in HIV-1 RNA compared to triple therapy, but no increase in the risk of drug resistance

  • A total of 273 patients with HIV-1 RNA B50 copies/mL for over 24 weeks on current antiretrovirals switched to DRV/r 800/100 mg once-daily, either as monotherapy (n0137) or with 2NRTIs (n0136), after a 4 week run-in phase with DRV/r ' 2NRTI

  • Treatment failure was defined as HIV-1 RNA levels above 50 copies/mL (FDA Snapshot method) by Week 48, or switches off study treatment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy has shown trends for higher low-level elevations in HIV-1 RNA compared to triple therapy, but no increase in the risk of drug resistance. The PROTEA trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL Andrea1; Arribas, Jose2; Fehr, Jan3; Girard, Pierre-Marie4; Horban, Andrzej5; Hill, Andrew6; van Delft, Yvon7; Moecklinghoff, Christiane8 and Hill, Andrew9

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.