Residential Inmate Aftercare:

Abstract

The halfway house as a transitional residence for offenders being released from an institution has perhaps been the most enthusiastically accepted correctional program over the past decade. The growth in numbers of programs has eclipsed the expectations of even the most optimistic advocates of halfway houses. However, there is still great argument over the benefit and possible disadvantages of the use of halfway houses. The more conservative wing within corrections argues that halfway houses are not effective, are costly, and add no assurance that a resident will not commit further crime against society. The backers of such programs emphasize the difficult transition from institution to community and the need for intermediate steps. A Law Enforcement Assistance Administration-funded analysis has surveyed adult halfway houses and reviewed relevant evaluations of such programs. General findings indicate that halfway house programs can more effectively reintegrate prisoners returning to the community than direct release to parole. In addition, if the halfway house acts as an alternative to incarceration, the cost to the correctional system can be favorably compared. Although more research and evaluation need to be completed, available findings document a positive benefit by the use of halfway houses in the correctional process.