Resection rectopexy as part of the multidisciplinary approach in the management of complex pelvic floor disorders.

Abstract

Pelvic floor disorders are frequently caused byan organ prolapse involving multiple pelvic floor compartments. In such cases, a multidisciplinary strategy for diagnostic work-up and therapy is required. All patients who underwent transabdominal rectopexy/resection rectopexy alone or in combination with simultaneous gynecological pelvic floor reconstruction at our institution between 01/2006 and 12/2021 were included in this retrospective study. The study aimed to evaluate the functional outcome and postoperative complications. Two hundred and eighty seven patients were assigned to one of the following groups: PG1- patient group one: after resection rectopexy (n=141); PG2- after ventral rectopexy (n=8); PG3- after combined resection rectopexy and sacro (cervico)colpopexy (n=62); PG4- after combined resection rectopexy and trans-vaginal pelvic floor repair (n=76). The duration of follow-up was 14months for PG1 (median, IQR 37months), 11months for PG2 (mean, SD 9months), 7months for PG 3 (median, IQR 33months), and 12months for PG 4 (median, IQR 51 Months). The surgical procedure resulted in improvement of symptoms related to obstructed defecation in 56.4 % (22/39) of the patients in PG1, 25 % in PG2 (1/4), 62.5 % (20/32) in PG3, and 71.8 % (28/39) in PG4. "De novo" constipation was reported by 2.4 % (2/141) of patients from PG1. Improvement in fecal incontinence symptoms was reported by 69 % (40/58) of patients in PG1, 100 % in PG2 (2/2), 93.1 % (27/29) in PG3, and 87.2 % (34/39) in PG4. The recurrence rate for external rectal prolapse was 7.1 % in PG1, 50 % in PG2 (1/2), 2.7 % in PG3, and 6.3 % in PG4. A significant difference in terms of severe morbidity (grade≥ IIIb) and mortality could not be determined between the non-interdisciplinary (PG1 with PG2) and interdisciplinary surgery (PG3 with PG4) (p=0.88, p=0.499). Based on our results, we can assume that combined surgery is as feasible as rectal surgery alone. In our study, combined interventions were effective and not associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications.