Abstract
With the acquisition and merger of various companies in the international economic market becoming more and more common, the phenomenon of hostile takeover in order to obtain the interests and competitiveness of the company is also more and more, the target company to prevent hostile takeover also created a lot of anti-hostile takeover measures. The legal regulations of anti-hostile takeover are different in different countries, but the types of anti-hostile takeover events are rich, so that the current legal regulations are not perfect, the legality premise of anti-hostile takeover cannot be effectively guaranteed, and the legality of anti-hostile takeover cannot be effectively reviewed. Therefore, this paper will use research method, case analysis method and summary method to solve the problem that the current legal review standard is relatively vague and insufficient. It holds that a more reasonable legal review standard of anti-hostile takeover should be established by establishing relevant legal principles, reasonably distributing the decision-making rights of shareholders and the board of directors, confirming the rights and obligations of the decision makers of anti-hostile takeover, and protecting the interests of minority shareholders and employees.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
