Abstract

Taking the sustainable poverty alleviation governance as the research object, the sustainable evaluation system of poverty alleviation and governance is constructed according to the sustainable development level of poverty alleviation governance and the sustainable development ability of poverty alleviation governance. Using field survey data, this paper investigates the sustainable situation of poverty alleviation governance in 86 counties in China, and evaluates the effectiveness of governments and main responsibilities of at all levels of poverty alleviation governance. The study found that the overall sustainable development status of poverty alleviation governance at county level in China is in good condition or trend: in most counties is relatively strong, with an average score of 78.16, which reflects the remarkable results of targeted and precise measures of poverty alleviation. However, one-third of the counties have the secret worry of insufficient sustainable development capacity, and the sustainable aspect of county poverty alleviation governance in Northeast counties is generally weak, which needs to be focused on. In the post-poverty alleviation stage, we should start with the system construction, continuously improve the system and mechanism, and enhance the endogenous development ability of the poverty alleviation groups, so as to put forward countermeasures and suggestions.

Highlights

  • The sustainable evaluation of poverty alleviation governance is based on the sustainable livelihood framework, and the indicators connected to the sustainable poverty alleviation of farmers are selected to carry out related work

  • The sustainable evaluation indicators system of poverty alleviation governance is set as one Level 1 indicator, that is, the sustainable indicator of poverty alleviation governance; two Level 2 indicators, namely, the sustainable development level indicator of poverty alleviation and governance, and the sustainable development ability indicator of poverty alleviation and governance; five Level 3 indicators, namely, natural capital, material capital, financial capital, human capital and supporting capital

  • This paper studies and constructs the sustainable evaluation indicator system of poverty alleviation governance, and measures and evaluates the sustainable development level and sustainable development ability of poverty alleviation governance at the provincial level, reflecting the remarkable results of precise poverty alleviation and precise poverty alleviation, but there are still 1/3 counties with insufficient sustainable development capacity worries; the sustainable aspect of county poverty alleviation governance in the three eastern provinces is generally weak, which needs to be focused on

Read more

Summary

Introduction

China’s poverty alleviation work has made great achievements in recent years. From 1978 to the end of 2019, China’s rural absolute poverty population decreased from 770 million to 5.51 million, and the incidence of poverty dropped from 97.5% to 0.6%, but its complexity and difficulty are self-evident, and it is impossible to achieve once and for all. As poverty alleviation in an all-round way enters the final stage, the primary absolute poverty that has plagued rural areas for a long time has basically disappeared, and more problems such as the lack of stable anti-poverty capacity, and the phenomenon of returning to poverty caused by disasters, diseases, education, marriage and housing will exist for a long time, and poverty is entering “a new stage of transitional secondary poverty and relative poverty” (Li & Xu, 2018) This means that the focus of China’s poverty alleviation task will shift from eliminating absolute poverty to solving relative poverty. The stock corresponds to the level of sustainable development, and the increment corresponds to the capacity of sustainable development, so as to build a sustainable evaluation system of poverty alleviation governance, and evaluate the sustainable situation of which in 86 counties of the country

Literature Review
Evaluation System
Empirical Analysis
Conclusion and Recommendations
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call