Abstract

Runoff simulations are of great significance to the planning management of water resources. Here, we discussed the influence of the model component, model parameters and model input on runoff modeling, taking Hanjiang River Basin as the research area. Convolution kernel and attention mechanism were introduced into an LSTM network, and a new data-driven model Conv-TALSTM was developed. The model parameters were analyzed based on the Conv-TALSTM, and the results suggested that the optimal parameters were greatly affected by the correlation between the input data and output data. We compared the performance of Conv-TALSTM and variant models (TALSTM, Conv-LSTM, LSTM), and found that Conv-TALSTM can reproduce high flow more accurately. Moreover, the results were comparable when the model was trained with meteorological or hydrological variables, whereas the peak values with hydrological data were closer to the observations. When the two datasets were combined, the performance of the model was better. Additionally, Conv-TALSTM was also compared with an ANN (artificial neural network) and Wetspa (a distributed model for Water and Energy Transfer between Soil, Plants and Atmosphere), which verified the advantages of Conv-TALSTM in peak simulations. This study provides a direction for improving the accuracy, simplifying model structure and shortening calculation time in runoff simulations.

Highlights

  • Runoff simulations are of great significance to the planning management and rational utilization of water resources [1,2,3,4]

  • We analyzed the influence of input data on the optimization of ConvTALSTM model parameters, including the window size, the number of convolution kernels and the number of hidden layer neurons

  • This study investigated the application of deep learning in runoff simulations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Runoff simulations are of great significance to the planning management and rational utilization of water resources [1,2,3,4]. The model simulates the physical process of watershed runoff formation through the coupling of structure and parameters [8]. The distributed hydrological model based on complex physical mechanism can truly reflect the spatial variability of runoff and concentration process, the models have their applicable physical background, which limits the generality in all basins [16]. Due to the high degree of non-linearity, uncertainty and variability of the hydrological process, even if the model is improved, the runoff simulation may not meet expectations. It will encounter other problems, such as the same effect with different parameters, difficulty in obtaining data and expensive calculations [17,18]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call