Reproducibility of radiographic methods for assessing longitudinal tarsal axes: Part 1: Consecutive case study

Abstract

IntroductionCalcaneal pitch angle and Meary’s angle are commonly used to assess longitudinal foot arches on lateral-view radiographs. However, the methods used to obtain the talar, first metatarsal, calcaneal, and plantar axes differ across multiple reports, and no study has evaluated the reproducibility of these approaches. The aim of this study was to determine the most reproducible methods for radiographically evaluating longitudinal axes. MethodsStanding radiographic images of 40 feet from 21 consecutive outpatients were obtained to measure longitudinal axes of the talus, first metatarsal, calcaneus and plantar surface, which were defined using six, five, four and three different methods, respectively, selected from previous reports. Intraobserver and interobserver correlation coefficients were calculated. ResultsThe best intraobserver and interobserver correlation coefficients for the talar, first metatarsal, and calcaneal axes were obtained using methods involving a line bisecting the angle formed by the lines tangential to the superior and inferior margins of the talus, a line connecting the centre of the first metatarsal head and the midpoint of the visualized base of the first metatarsal, and a line drawn tangential to the inferior surface of the calcaneus, respectively. For the plantar axis, a method that used the horizontal plane (as a reference axis) was regarded as the best approach, although intraobserver and interobserver correlation coefficients could not be calculated because all values were zero. ConclusionsThe aforementioned methods were considered to be optimal for the radiographic assessment of longitudinal foot arches. This study could contribute to more accurate assessments of foot deformities.