Abstract
In response to the letter of Pace and Multani, in general, we cannot disagree with their considerations about the use of odds ratios, risk ratios, and rate ratios. [...].
Highlights
Elena Ricci 1,*, Stefania Noli 2, Sonia Cipriani 1, Irene La Vecchia 2, Francesca Chiaffarino 1, Stefania Ferrari 1, Paola Agnese Mauri 1,2, Marco Reschini 3, Luigi Fedele 1,2 and Fabio Parazzini 1,2
Dear Editor, In response to the letter of Pace and Multani, in general, we cannot disagree with their considerations about the use of odds ratios, risk ratios, and rate ratios
All estimates were not far from unit and odds ratios were good estimates of both risk ratios and rate ratios, we agreed to that request and reported our results as rate ratios
Summary
Elena Ricci 1,* , Stefania Noli 2, Sonia Cipriani 1, Irene La Vecchia 2, Francesca Chiaffarino 1, Stefania Ferrari 1, Paola Agnese Mauri 1,2 , Marco Reschini 3 , Luigi Fedele 1,2 and Fabio Parazzini 1,2. Dipartimento Donna-Bambino-Neonato, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; son.cipriani@gmail.com (S.C.); francesca.chiaffarino@gmail.com (F.C.); stefania.ferrari@policlinico.mi.it (S.F.); paola.mauri@unimi.it (P.A.M.); luigi.fedele@unimi.it (L.F.); fabio.parazzini@unimi.it (F.P.) Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; stefi.noli@gmail.com (S.N.); irene.lavecchia@unimi.it (I.L.V.) Infertility Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; m.reschini@gmail.com
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have