Abstract

The flipped classroom, an educational alternative to the traditional lecture, has been widely adopted by educators at all levels of education and across many disciplines. In the flipped classroom, learners prepare in advance of the face-to-face meeting by learning content material on their own. Classroom time is reserved for application of the learned content to solving problems or discussing cases. Over the past year, we replaced most residency program lectures with small-group discussions using the flipped-classroom model, case-based learning, simulation and procedure labs. In the new model, residents prepared for conference by reviewing a patient case and studying suggested learning materials. Conference day was set aside for facilitated small-group discussions about the case. This is a cross-cohort study of emergency medicine residents who experienced the lecture-based curriculum to residents in the new flipped-classroom curriculum using paired comparisons (independent t-tests) on in-training exam scores while controlling for program year level. We also compared results of the evaluation of various program components. We observed no differences between cohorts on in-training examination scores. Small-group methods were rated the same across program years. Two program components in the new curriculum, an updated format of both adult and pediatric case conferences, were rated significantly higher on program quality. In preparation for didactics, residents in the new curriculum report spending more time on average with outside learning materials, including almost twice as much time reviewing textbooks. Residents found the new format of the case conferences to be of higher quality because of the inclusion of rapid-fire case discussions with targeted learning points.

Highlights

  • The lecture has long been the primary teaching method for graduate medical education.[1]

  • Effectiveness of lectures as a teaching method has been called into question due to the lack of learner engagement.[2,3]

  • While learners in our program seemingly have responded to the flipped classroom by adopting the required preliminary learning, we are unable to confirm that the flipped-classroom model is truly superior to traditional lecture methods with regards to educational efficacy

Read more

Summary

BACKGROUND

The lecture has long been the primary teaching method for graduate medical education.[1]. Studies of the flipped classroom are small and observational, there is growing consensus that students favor this method over the traditional lecture.[10, 15,16,17,18,19] In the flipped classroom, learners use study time to build a foundation for new learning instead of spending that time reviewing lecture notes and retrofitting new knowledge with old. The flippedclassroom method promotes longer term retention but provides learners with cues to the depth and breadth required for use of the new knowledge in clinical application. Challenges associated with the flipped-classroom model include increased time commitment for both educators and learners, effective integration of technology, ensuring individual learner accountability, and promotion of a safe learning environment.[10,11, 18,20]. For the 2015-16 academic year (AY 2016), we changed our didactic format to the flipped-classroom model

OBJECTIVE
DISCUSSION
LIMITATIONS
Findings
Procedures lab
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call