Abstract
Phenotypic measurements (e.g., body mass, metabolic rate) made at one point in time are often assumed to represent measurements made at other times. However, if traits are not repeatable over time, inferences about ecological, environmental, or other correlates of the trait could be misleading. We found that evaporative water loss, oxygen consumption, resting metabolic rate, and their residuals from body mass were significantly repeatable (intraclass correlations generally >0.6) in Merriam's kangaroo rats (Dipodomys merriami). Nevertheless, our data, plus a review of the scant data on repeatability of mammalian physiological traits, show that repeatability typically is less than perfect (i.e., less than one). Consequently, investigators studying physiological performance of mammals should not assume that the traits they study are good indicators of performance at other points in time.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
