Abstract
Inquiries1 about religious experience come in two kinds: a priori examinations about what can possibly be true about religious experiences, and phenomenological studies, which seek to describe and catalogue the experiences. This inquiry is of the latter type, which is already well represented by many excellent works.2 The purpose of this essay is not to attempt to add anything which those others have missed, but rather to take on a minor task which they never intended to undertake, but one that they should have undertaken; that is, to understand religious experience first of all as an epistemic event, and only then to draw metaphysical conclusions from it. For this purpose, the most important facet of religious experience is not the feelings aroused, the psychological state of the subject, or what they came to believe. The most important thing about religious experience is that its subjects do come to believe things, and moreover, that they believe it is a source of knowledge. Not only do people come to believe things because of their religious experiences, but they sometimes behave as if the beliefs acquired this way were more certain than any other opinions. The faithful often compare religious experience to sensory experience and attribute the same degree of certainty to it. That it has become the basis of an argument for the existence of God which has had avid defenders shows the great importance it has taken on. It is certainly in order to study religious experience as a psychological event, and a priori discussions are also legitimate pursuits, but that religious experience is thought by its subjects to be an avenue of knowledge demands that we should also examine it in that light. Whenever events or processes work to form people's opinions, whether the method or process is magic, science, or sense -perception, that method of forming opinions should be subject to epistemological analysis. We should be examining what happens to the belief system of a person who has a religious experience. Religious experiences fall neatly into two categories. The first is well represented by Arjuna and Saul of Tarsus: these experiences are those that come unannounced and unexpected. Let us call them 'type A'. The second type is that which is represented by Buddha's arrival at enlightenment: they come only to those who seek them, and as the result of some technique or discipline. Let us call them 'type B'.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Religious Experience
Saul Of Tarsus
Psychological Event
People's Opinions
Source Of Knowledge
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Jan 1, 2019
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Jun 1, 1982
Jan 1, 2019
Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing
May 1, 2014
Journal of Religion and Human Relations
Nov 16, 2022
Spirituality and Health International
Dec 1, 2008
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Oct 1, 2011
African Research Review
Mar 17, 2011
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Jan 1, 1986
Modern Drama
Jan 1, 1962
Psychiatric News
Jun 1, 2022
Mental Health, Religion & Culture
Sep 1, 2007
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Nov 14, 2023
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Oct 20, 2023
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Sep 22, 2023
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Sep 7, 2023
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Aug 17, 2023
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Aug 11, 2023
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Jul 10, 2023
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Jul 4, 2023
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Jun 23, 2023
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Jun 20, 2023