Abstract

Smartphone mechanocardiography (sMCG) is a new technique that allows patients to record a cardiac rhythm strip using a smartphone built-in tri-axial accelerometer and gyroscope. In this study, we investigated how a self-applied sMCG can reliably contribute to the differentiation of atrial fibrillation (AFib) from the sinus rhythm (SR). A study sample of 300 elderly adults including 150 AFib cases with persistent and paroxysmal AFib was recruited. Among the 300 subjects, 182 subjects (82 AFib) completed two recordings, one physician-applied and one self-applied. The remaining patients (n = 118) were nervous, in a quite poor condition, and not interested in or capable of concentrating on using a smartphone in the acute setting of a hospital in order to perform the self-applied recording. Two data processing frameworks were used, knowledge-based learning (KL) which is a rule-based algorithm and machine learning (ML) which is an automated classification technique. For the ML approach, we considered four classifiers, namely random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), support vector machines (SVM), and artificial neural network (NN). For evaluation, a leave-one-subject-out cross-validation was adopted for the ML approach. Compared to physician-interpreted ECG-derived labels, the KL approach predicted AFib with sensitivity values of 0.963 and 0.976, specificity values of 0.980 and 0.929, and F-measure values of 0.972 and 0.952 for the physician- and self-applied measurements, respectively. Similarly, NN which was the best ML classifier according to the F-measure values, demonstrated, on average, sensitivity values of 0.976 and 0.938, specificity values of 0.962 and 0.936, and F-measure values of 0.969 and 0.937, respectively. All other classifiers delivered quite similar results. The sMCG technology for AFib detection, supported by the KL and ML approaches, can accurately differentiate AFib from SR in both physician- and self-applied recording scenarios. This new technology can help to screen patients with episodic or undiagnosed AFib and also be used as a home-based self-applied monitoring technique.

Highlights

  • Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is one of the most prevalent cardiovascular conditions that can result in a stroke and heart failure, two of the most common causes of mortality and morbidity [1]

  • ROC curves of the predictions made by the machine learning (ML) approach for the physician- and self-applied data are presented in Figure 4a and Figure 4b, respectively

  • PREDICTION CONSISTENCY OF THE knowledge-based learning (KL) APPROACH In order for us to compare the exact prediction of each approach for a certain subject, we introduce a barcode plot in which the true label for each subject is marked with a color

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is one of the most prevalent cardiovascular conditions that can result in a stroke and heart failure, two of the most common causes of mortality and morbidity [1]. An irregular heart rhythm as well as fast. Atrial pacing, not always detectable with suboptimal heart monitoring modalities, are the major characteristics of AFib. Diagnosis of AFib is complicated since the shape and the chronology of the ventricular complex cannot be predicted. Detecting inter-beat intervals that are completely random and irregular utilizing a rhythm irregularity analysis is a favorable approach to AFib diagnosis [2].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call