Abstract

This study aimed to measure the reliability of a test for measuring the strength and strength imbalance of the hip abductors and adductors, using isokinetic equipment adapted for isometric testing. Thirteen healthy, physically active male individuals took part in the research. Two unilateral isometric tests were undertaken using a load cell attached to an adapted abductor bench machine: a hip abduction test and hip adduction test. Tests consisted of two maximum voluntary isometric contractions made for six seconds with a break of one minute between each. The following dynamic variables were measured: maximum force, mean force, rate of force development for each limb (right and left), and the existence of asymmetries between the limbs. For statistical analysis, the t-test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and standard error of measurement (SEM) were applied. Results: The methodology utilized for the evaluation of the hip abductors and adductors did not show reliability in most of the parameters researched, with the ICC neither sufficient or low, and the retest performance higher than the test (p < 0.05). The applied test was not reliable for assessing strength and strength imbalances of hip abductors and adductors in most of the parameters investigated. These results indicate that the hip joints, more precisely, the abductor and adductor muscles, are complex structures to be assessed. They need to be previously familiarized with the proposed exercise, as their performance does not occur habitually. It is recommended to develop new tests in order to measure hip abduction and adduction strength adding a prior familiarization procedure.

Highlights

  • Muscle imbalances are alterations in the recruitment of one or more muscles in a given movement, which can generate dysfunction and contribute to the emergence of functionally disabling pathologies (SAHRMANN, 2002)

  • There was a significant difference between test and retest in the following variables: right abduction test (AB) (ABR) FMEAN (p < 0.01), left AB (ABL) FMAX (p < 0.02), ABL FMEAN (p < 0.01), AB asymmetry (ABA) FMAX (p < 0.05), and ABA FMEAN (p < 0.03)

  • The variables that reported the lowest levels in relative standard error of measurement (SEM) were: ABR FMAX, ABL FMEAN, ADR FMAX, left ADL (ADL) FMAX, ADD/ABD FMEAN, ADL/ABL FMAX, ABA FMAX, and AD asymmetry (ADA) FMAX

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Muscle imbalances are alterations in the recruitment of one or more muscles in a given movement, which can generate dysfunction and contribute to the emergence of functionally disabling pathologies (SAHRMANN, 2002) These changes may occur either between agonists and antagonists or between the dominant and nondominant limbs, and are among the reasons mentioned in the literature as potential causes of muscular injuries and decreases in performance (MAGALHÃES et al, 2004). It is known that strength imbalance acts statically and dynamically over joints and may surge as a result of the standard of use in daily activities and sports, resulting from developing a specific musculature according to the overload applied These muscular specializations might initiate posture and mechanical joint changes, in addition to overloading musculo tendinous structures around the joints (PANNI et al, 2002; SIQUEIRA et al, 2002). This type of imbalance is linked to side preference, a human characteristic understood as the predisposition to choosing a limb in relation to the homologous contralateral to perform motor actions (WITVROUW et al, 2003)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call