Release of genetically engineered micro-organisms into the environment

Abstract

Genetically engineered micro-organisms (GEM) at present are the subject of much public attention. They are being considered for biological control, frost protection of plants, and other applications. There is a need to test such organisms before release to the environment. Examples of GEM includePseudomonas fluorescens into which have been cloned δ-toxin genes ofBacillus thuringiensis, ‘ice-minus bacteria’, and other organisms modified by addition, rearrangement and/or deletion of genetic material. Prior to release, the survival, fate, and effects of GEM in the environment must be established. Because organisms, once released, cannot be recalled or always controlled, it is imperative that a full understanding of the risks be known. Predictive ecology must include the new sub-discipline of molecular microbial ecology, if the need for information prior to release of GEM is to be met. One of the most important aspects of deliberate release which must be considered is the ability to detect and monitor GEM in the environment. It has been discovered that micro-organisms can undergo ‘dormancy’, i.e. enter a viable but non-recoverable stage in the natural environment. New techniques have been developed, employing immunofluorescent/epifluorescent microscopy, coupled with 5S rRNA sequencing, which allow accurate non-genetic detection of GEM. These techniques have been employed in aquatic systems. Charateristics of GEM important in release to the environment include ability to colonize surfaces, transfer genetic material and persist in specific environments. Clearly, the effects of GEM on the environment cannot be precisely predicted, unless the organisms have been so debilitated that they cannot persist in any natural habitat and cannot exchange genetic material with any other organism. It must be recognized that micro-organisms are extremely diverse and versatile. Uniformly applied, standard regulations governing deliberate release of GEM to the environment cannot be applied in the same way as for regulation of chemicals or medical devices. Case-by-case regulation appears to be the best approach for the immediate future. The implications of each organism, in terms of its own biology, will have to be considered.