Relativistic Advanced Waves and Vector-Tensor-Scalar Geometry As Aids to Accurate Radiometric Dating

Abstract

Most people think science is exclusively about things like experiments, observations, and measurement. But to quote Professor of Mathematics Holmes Boynton who wrote World Book Encyclopedia’s “Geometry” article, “(Geometry) is important (later in the paragraph the quote is from, he uses the words “simple and easy to picture”) … because it shows students how to develop ideas by logical reasoning, rather than by observation, description, and measurement.” Therefore, it’s reasonable to use a simple geometry to help show that physics has uncovered a flaw with the results of all kinds of radioactive dating. Four years after publishing General Relativity (ie in 1919), Albert Einstein published a paper that asked Do gravitational fields play an essential role in the structure of elementary particles? (1) That paper was published in an attempt to clarify the inner workings of the atom. But it might well apply in the present paper. Central to radiometric dating’s overestimates are two things: a) mathematics’ vector-tensor-scalar geometry (a simple geometry conceived by the author) which, answering “yes” to Einstein’s 1919 paper, shows that gravitational and electromagnetic waves compose particles of matter; and b) the conclusion supported by last century’s physics that these waves contain “advanced” and “retarded” components travelling backwards and forwards in time (this is not science fiction but will be reconciled here with quantum entanglement as well as Einstein’s Relativity). Astronomers study gravitational and electromagnetic waves - it's natural to wonder if, for example, distances to astronomical objects have also been overestimated. Intriguingly, neutralizing the advanced waves should dramatically increase the health and lifespan of humans and all other species if it doesn't adversely affect anatomy and physiology ie if the retarded waves alone are sufficient for normal structure and function. The cosmological implications of this work are – a) it relates waves to the Complex Number Plane and Wick rotation - different phases rotate from the x-axis to the so-called “imaginary” y-axis where they can produce the extra mass of another large-scale dimension (so-called Dark Matter) as well as the Dark Energy which the mass possesses, a b) it redefines electromagnetism and proposes an eternally infinite universe. The article ends with the paradox of creating an eternally infinite universe using bits, mathematical topology, pi and imaginary time – humanity of the remote future being the Elohim, a name used for God which means the PLURAL MAJESTY OF THE ONE GOD – and a method of learning inspired by Stephen Hawking’s reference to a “complete unified theory” in his book “A Brief History of Time”. Intro - Does the quote “There but for the grace of God go cause you to think of Leonardo da Vinci? The quote is attributed to English preacher John Bradford (1510-1555), and was prompted when he saw a group of criminals being led to their executions. Of Leonardo, Wikipedia reports, He made substantial discoveries in anatomy, civil engineering, geology, optics, and hydrodynamics, but he not publish his findings and they had no direct influence on subsequent science. I've never been able (after years of trying) to interest a science journal in anything I've written. So, like Leonardo, I did not publish (my) findings and they (may have) no direct influence on subsequent science. Unlike him, I'm not restricted to print but can publish my crazy, far-out ideas on the Internet. So my mind says “There but for the grace of the Internet go when I think of Leonardo da Vinci. Some scientists, even including ones with a Nobel, believe articles aren't worth reading unless they've appeared in a science journal and are written the way those scientists expect. But some of you are open to the unexpected - and I'll trust you, as well as scientists who may not be born yet, to read my ideas and decide if they really are crazy, or merely outside the scope (a phrase commonly used by journals) of the early 21st century.