Abstract

AbstractBiological nitrification inhibition is a plant‐mediated rhizosphere process where natural nitrification inhibitors can be produced and released by roots to suppress nitrifier activity in soil. Nitrification is one of the critical soil processes in the nitrogen (N) cycle, but unrestricted and rapid nitrification in agricultural systems can result in major losses of N from the plant–soil system (i.e., by NO3− leaching and gaseous N emissions). In this study, we explored the potential efficacy of biological nitrification inhibitors (linoleic acid [LA] and linolenic acid [LN]) and a proven efficient synthetic (dicyandiamide [DCD]) nitrification inhibitor on N dynamics, nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in a highly nitrifying soil. 14C‐labelled LA, LN and DCD mineralization was determined in a parallel experiment to explore the fate of inhibitors after application. We found that LA and LN had no effect on soil NH4+ concentrations, but significantly decreased NO3− concentrations. Soil that received DCD had lower NO3− and higher NH4+ concentrations than the control (soil without nitrification inhibitors). LA and LN increased the cumulative N2O and CO2 emissions when they were applied at high concentrations (635 or 1,270 mg kg−1 dry soil). LA and LN had a much greater mineralization rate than that of DCD: 47–56%, 37–61% and 2.7–5.5%, respectively, after 38 days incubation. We conclude that in contrast to the direct inhibition of nitrification caused by DCD, addition of LA and LN may cause apparent nitrification inhibition by promoting microbial immobilization of soil NH4+ and/or NO3−. Future studies on nitrification inhibitors need to clearly differentiate between the direct and indirect effects that result from addition of these compounds to soil.Highlights The efficacy and stability of nitrification inhibitors in a highly nitrifying soil were explored. This study supports efforts to mitigate N losses and improve nitrogen use efficiency of inputs. Addition of LA, LN and DCD can decrease NO3− concentration, but their modes of action may be different. The apparent effect of LA and LN on soil NO3− concentration could be indirect.

Highlights

  • In the past decades, the global supply of nitrogen (N) fertilisers has increased dramatically, and is estimated to reach 171 million tons in 2020 (FAO, 2017)

  • We explored the potential efficacy of biological nitrification inhibitors and a proven efficient synthetic nitrification inhibitor on N dynamics, nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in a highly nitrifying soil. 14C-labelled linoleic acid (LA), linolenic acid (LN) and DCD mineralization was determined in a parallel experiment to explore the fate of inhibitors after application

  • Our results confirmed that the addition of LA, LN and DCD can decrease soil NO3− concentration, but their modes of action may be different

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The global supply of nitrogen (N) fertilisers has increased dramatically, and is estimated to reach 171 million tons in 2020 (FAO, 2017). The use of synthetic N fertilisers is central to maintaining food security, their use is strongly associated with many of the world's most serious environmental problems (e.g., marine eutrophication, global warming, ozone depletion and air pollution) (Erisman et al, 2013). These issues are directly associated with the inefficient use of fertiliser N and large losses of N from agricultural systems either in gaseous, for example ammonia (NH3), nitrous oxide (N2O) and dinitrogen (N2), or aqueous forms (dissolved organic N, nitrate (NO3−)) (Gardiner et al, 2016). One of the proposed strategies is the targeted use of chemicals to control the rate of key N transformations in the soil that result in the losses of N to the environment, for example urea ! ammonium (NH4+) and NH4+ ! NO3−

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call