Abstract
Leader-member exchange (LMX) theory posits that leaders develop special relationships with certain employees. By and large, prior studies have emphasized the positive aspects of LMX for employees who have high-quality exchange relationships with their supervisors (e.g., higher job satisfaction, career success). However, given the benefits that tend to accrue to employees in high-quality exchange relationships, workers who have relatively low-quality exchange relationships with their supervisors are likely to be frustrated when they compare their situation to that of their peers. Using the framework outlined by relative deprivation theory, this paper develops a theoretical model identifying when employees with relatively low-quality LMX relationships are most likely to feel aggrieved. In addition, this paper discusses the factors that may determine how employees respond to feelings of relative deprivation that arise from their LMX relationships. Directions for future research that empirically examines some of these propositions are discussed as well.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.