Abstract

Anthropogenic activities, such as land use and land cover modifications in riparian areas, can alter the degree of fragmentation of riparian vegetation, lead to the degradation of stream habitats, and affect biological communities in the streams. The characteristics of the riparian forests can modify the condition of stream environments and the transporting mechanisms of materials, sediments, nutrients, and pollutants loaded from the watersheds. This study aimed to examine the relationships between forest fragmentation and three biological indicators of trophic diatom, benthic macroinvertebrate, and the fish assessment in the Nakdong River, Korea. Eighty-nine biological assessment sampling sites in the National Aquatic Ecological Monitoring Program of South Korea were identified. For each sampling site, riparian forest data within a 500 m radius were extracted from national LULC using GIS to compute fragmentation metrics using FRAGSTATS software. Four fragmentation metrics—number of forest patches, percentage of riparian forest cover (PLAND), largest riparian forest patch index (LPI), and riparian forest division index (DIVISION)—were correlated with the biological indicators. Also, due to severe spatial autocorrelation among observations, the fragmentation metrics and stream environmental variables were regressed to biological indicators using regression tree analysis. Our results indicate that the biological indicators were significantly associated with most forest fragmentation metrics. We found positive correlations of PLAND and LPI with biological indicators, whereas DIVISION was negatively correlated with biological indicators. Both correlation and regression tree analyses revealed that the biological conditions of streams were likely to be better if riparian forests are less fragmented. Particularly, stronger relationships were revealed between macroinvertebrates and fish with the fragmentation metrics of riparian forests than with benthic diatoms. However, these relationships varied with elevation, stream size, and slope conditions. The results of this study reinforced the importance of including riparian forests in the planning, restoration, and management of stream environments. These results also suggested that planners and managers may need to consider different strategies for different stream environments and topographic characteristics in managing riparian forests.

Highlights

  • The relationship between land use and the biological condition of streams has been a primary research area in stream ecosystem studies

  • We examined the relationships between riparian forest fragmentation and biological indicators in different stream environments on a large riparian buffer scale

  • The results of this study indicate that a higher degree of riparian forest fragmentation negatively affects biological status of benthic diatoms, macroinvertebrates, and fish in streams

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The relationship between land use and the biological condition of streams has been a primary research area in stream ecosystem studies. Various types of riparian vegetation (e.g., riparian buffer, buffer strip, and vegetation strip) have been shown to have positive effects on both biological and nonbiological characteristics of streams, such as stabilizing stream banks [14,15,16], reducing nutrient and sediment loading from anthropogenic land uses from watersheds into streams [1,17,18], lowering stream water temperature by providing shade [19,20], providing habitats for aquatic and terrestrial organisms [21,22,23], enhancing ecological integrity and biodiversity [24,25], and mediating the negative impacts of land uses on streams in watersheds [10,26,27]. From a river–watershed continuum perspective, Fischer and Fischenich [40] suggested a ~500 m buffer width for riparian habitats of riverside species (e.g., birds and relatively larger mammals)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.