Abstract

While eye movements were recorded and brains scanned, 29 children with and without specific learning disabilities (SLDs) decided if sentences they read (half with only correctly spelled words and half with homonym foils) were meaningful. Significant main effects were found for diagnostic groups (non-SLD control, dysgraphia control, and dyslexia) in total fixation (dwell) time, total number of fixations, and total regressions in during saccades; the dyslexia group had longer and more fixations and made more regressions in during saccades than either control group. The dyslexia group also differed from both control groups in (a) fractional anisotropy in left optic radiation and (b) silent word reading fluency on a task in which surrounding letters can be distracting, consistent with Rayner's selective attention dyslexia model. Different profiles for non-SLD control, dysgraphia, and dyslexia groups were identified in correlations between total fixation time, total number of fixations, regressions in during saccades, magnitude of gray matter connectivity during the fMRI sentence reading comprehension from left occipital temporal cortex seed with right BA44 and from left inferior frontal gyrus with right inferior frontoccipital fasciculus, and normed word-specific spelling and silent word reading fluency measures. The dysgraphia group was more likely than the non-SLD control or dyslexia groups to show negative correlations between eye movement outcomes and sentences containing incorrect homonym foils. Findings are discussed in reference to a systems approach in future sentence reading comprehension research that integrates eye movement, brain, and literacy measures.

Highlights

  • Psychological science has established that eyes are constantly in motion, even though humans are not consciously aware of this motion [1,2,3]

  • Overall the total number of fixations during the fMRI silent reading comprehension task was greater for the dyslexia group and about the same for the dysgraphia group and the non-specific learning disabilities (SLDs) control group.The average number of regressions in during saccades was higher in the dyslexia group than in the dysgraphia group or non-SLD control group.Additional analyses comparing groups two at a time showed that the dysgraphia group did not differ significantly from the non-SLD control group in total fixation dwell time, total number of fixations, or regression in

  • The second tested hypothesisthat the dyslexia group would differ from the dysgraphia group on sentence reading comprehension was supported for (a) eye movement outcomes that differentiated diagnostic groups—total fixation time, total number of fixations, and number of regressions in during saccade, (b) correlations between eye movements with word specific spelling and silent word reading fluency, and (c) connectivity from the left OTC and the left IFG seeds

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Psychological science has established that eyes are constantly in motion, even though humans are not consciously aware of this motion [1,2,3] When individuals read, their eyes make rapid ballistic eye movements (saccades) followed by moments of relative stability (fixations).During fixations, initial processing of letters and written words begins [3], based on information in stimuli received from the retina’s fovea, which is sensitive to visual detail, in contrast to the retina’s periphery, which detects contrasts between darkness and brightness.Saccades (forward progressions and backward regressions) alternate with fixations, but the majority of time is devoted to the fixation themselves rather than the forward movements to new fixations or backward regressions to prior fixations or skipped words; and typically more saccades are forward from fixated words than backwards to a prior fixation or skipped word [1,2]. The regression may reflect self-monitoring during the reading process and indicate that the reader is trying to integrate the currently fixated target with accumulating words in sentence syntax and returns through a regression out of the currently fixated word to previous fixation to verify what a prior word or group of words was

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call