Relationship Between Industrial Production and Pawnshop Market of the Ural Macroregion

Natalia Novikova,Mariia Rigel,E.B Dvoryadkina,E.G Animitsa

doi:10.1051/shsconf/20219305020

Natalia Novikova, Mariia Rigel + Show 2 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219305020

Copy DOI

Abstract

The article focuses on the need to study the processes of a new high-tech industrialization (neo-industrialization) at the macroregion level. The object of the study is the economic region of the Russian Federation (the macroregion) as a relatively integral spatially localized and complexly structured socio-economic entity, which includes four Ural regions – Kurgan region, Orenburg region, Sverdlovsk region and Chelyabinsk region, Perm krai and two republics – Republic of Bashkortostan and Republic of Udmurtia, which corresponds to the borders of the Ural economic region according to the all-Russian classifier of economic regions. The purpose of this study is to prove the relationship between the level of industrial production and the level of the pawnshop market development in the Ural macroregion. The territory of the Ural macroregion is analyzed from the perspective of the relationship between the level of industrial production and the level of the pawnshop market development. The Authors proved the existence of a direct relationship between the level of industrial production and the level of pawnshops territorial concentration, and also identified the territories that are leaders in the pawnshops concentration. The Authors put forward a scientific hypothesis about the most effective model of pawnshop activity. The conclusion is made about mutually beneficial cooperation between precious metal processing enterprises and pawnshops, which contributes to the development of both the pawnshop sector and this type of industrial activity.

Highlights

Searching for a new model of economic development based on a new quality of economic growth that meets the challenges of the fourth industrial revolution and the accelerated formation of the fifth and sixth technological orders, scientific discussions are increasingly focused on the economic paradigm of a new industrialization
The territorial boundaries of the study include the Kurgan, Orenburg, Sverdlovsk and Chelyabinsk regions, the Perm krai, as well as the Republics of Bashkortostan and Udmurtia, which corresponds to the borders of the Ural economic region according to the all-Russian classifier of economic regions (OK 024-95)
We present an analysis of the level of pawnshop activity concentration subject to the level of industrial production development

Summary

Introduction

Searching for a new model of economic development based on a new quality of economic growth that meets the challenges of the fourth industrial revolution and the accelerated formation of the fifth and sixth technological orders, scientific discussions are increasingly focused on the economic paradigm of a new industrialization (neoindustrialization). The main idea of the new industrialization is the industrial production development based on advanced modern technologies [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. According to the Authors, the study of new industrialization processes should be carried out at the level of regions (macroregions), due to the fact that a space with its specific conditions and factors accelerates or slows down its dynamics [9, 10, 11, 12]. It is obvious that each territory of the Ural macroregion has its own unique features of both industry and services development. The study revealed the relationship between the level of industrial development in a particular territory and the level of development of such a specific service sector as pawnshops

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion