Abstract

This paper focuses on two components of idle time and waiting time, namely core idle time, ∑CITi, and core waiting time, ∑CWTj. Both measures are relevant indicators of the efficiency of production systems, since they are directly related to machine utilization and to the flow of jobs, and they can be used as scheduling criteria if no-idle and no-wait constraints do not have to be strictly enforced. However, they have been scarcely considered in the literature, and their relationship with other objectives in the permutation flowshop literature (makespan or Cmax and total completion time or ∑Cj), has not been studied. To bridge this gap, the alignment between ∑CITi and ∑CWTj, and the classical scheduling criteria is studied. First, it is shown that ∑CWTj (∑CITi) is tantamount to ∑Cj (Cmax) for some special cases. Secondly, the general case with randomly generated processing times is computationally analysed using exact methods. Results show alignment between ∑CWTj and ∑Cj and between ∑CITi and Cmax, being the alignment stronger for the first pair of objectives. Based on the analysis, conclusions about the possibilities for the permutation flowshop problem with these new objectives are established.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.