Abstract

Brittleness and crack initiation stress (σci) are important rock mechanical properties and intrinsically related to rock deformation and failure. We establish the relationship between σci and uniaxial tensile strength (σt) based on the Griffith stress criterion of brittle failure and introduce brittleness indexes B1–B4 based on the ratio of uniaxial compressive strength (σc) to σt. The crack initiation stress ratio (K) is defined as the ratio of σci to crack damage stress. The relationship between brittleness index and K is obtained from laboratory mechanics tests including uniaxial compression and Brazilian splitting tests. The results show that B1 and B2 have an inversely proportional and variant inversely proportional relationship with K, respectively, whereas no apparent relationship is observed between B3 and B4 and K. The fitting of experimental data from igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks shows that B1 and B2 have a power and linear relationship with K, respectively, whereas no functional relationship is observed between B3 and B4 and K. We collected 70 different types of uniaxial compression test data for igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks and obtained laws that are consistent within each rock type. The experimental data are used to verify K estimations using a specified constant α based on the experimental data. According to results of the limestone tests, α = 3 for σc < 60 MPa (high porosity), α = 5 for 60 MPa ≤ σc ≤ 90 MPa (moderate porosity), and α = 8 for σc > 90 MPa (low porosity) as well as for igneous and metamorphic rocks. Estimates of K for 127 different rock types using the newly defined brittleness index are in good agreement with the experimental results. This study provides an important new brittleness index calculation method and a simple and reliable method for estimating K.

Highlights

  • Brittleness and crack initiation stress are important rock mechanical properties and intrinsically related to rock deformation and failure

  • We use the newly defined brittleness index to estimate K from 127 different rocks types and compare the results with the experimental results. e feasibility of using K to calculate the brittleness index is verified by the results presented here. is provides a simple and reliable method for estimating K

  • We determined the relationship between brittleness index and crack initiation stress ratio (K) by fracture mechanics theory and indoor uniaxial compression tests

Read more

Summary

Crack Initiation Mechanism of Rock under Uniaxial Compression

Lockner [21] argued that deformation and failure is a progressive process characterized by the initiation, propagation, and coalescence of microcracks for most rock samples. The stress-strain curve is usually divided into five stages (I–V), where σci and σcd are the focus of rock mechanical studies [26,27,28,29]. E determination of σcd has been widely reported, namely, the axial stress corresponding to the volume strain reversal point. Martin [30] proposed a crack volumetric strain method to determine rock σci from uniaxial or triaxial tests. Σci can be determined as the point where volumetric strain starts to deviate from the straight line of stage II, and the two methods can be calibrated to each other. A total of 227 sets of uniaxial compression test data for different rock samples were collected from various literature sources [32], including 138, 53, and 36 sets from igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks, respectively. We use the theory of fracture mechanics to study the relationship between brittleness index and K

Analysis of the Relationship between Brittleness Index and K Value
Crack coalescence σcd
Experimental Materials and Methods
Igneous Rock
Metamorphic Rock
Sedimentary Rock
Method
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call