Relationship between baseline levels of subjective cognitive concern and physical, cognitive and social activity in the U.S. POINTER Study

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThere has been little investigation into the relationship between physical, cognitive, and social activity and subjective concern about cognition (SCD) in the absence of objective cognitive decline. This concern about subjective change is an important concept in the field of Alzheimer’s disease as it independently confers risk for developing MCI/AD. However, the exact relationship between SCD and engagement in positive daily activities is poorly understood. This project examines the relationship between SCD and self‐reported engagement in these activities.MethodU.S. POINTER is a phase 3, multicenter, 2‐year randomized controlled trial of two lifestyle interventions varying in intensity and format, conducted in older adults living in the U.S. who do not have objective cognitive impairment at study entry, but have increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Participants completed myriad measures at baseline, including the Cognitive Function Inventory (CFI) assessing subjective cognitive decline, and the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) which assesses self‐reported engagement in social, cognitive, and physical activities over the past 4 weeks.ResultsBaseline study characteristics of the current sample (N = 1823) are: Mean age = 68.2y (5.2), 73.5% female, 29.8% with less than 18+ years education, and 29.3% from underrepresented groups (URG). In separate multivariate linear models, CFI was associated with weekly caloric expenditure in exercise (p< .001) and cognitive activity (p <.001), such that CFI scores were higher for participants with lower exercise‐related caloric expenditure and lower cognitive activity levels. Higher CFI scores also tended to predict social activity levels (p = .06). The inverse relationship between CFI and all three variables is significant in women (p = .04; .0001; .05, respectively) but not in men, and the CFI‐cognitive activity relationship is significant for URG (p = .005) but not White participants.ConclusionIn sum, SCD and engagement in physical, cognitive, and social activities are inversely related to varying degrees, such that individuals who report lower levels of engagement in these activities report more subjective cognitive concerns. However, different patterns emerged for some subgroups. Additional modeling is needed to demonstrate the directionality of the relationships between these activities and CFI, and the relationship with demographic variables of interest.