Rejuvenation of the lithospheric mantle beneath the orogens: Constraints from elemental geochemistry and Os isotopes in mantle xenoliths

Abstract

Continental orogens that involve subduction and collision are important target areas for studying the growth, stabilization and transformation of Earth’s continents. In particular, the nature of the lithospheric mantle and its relationship to the overlying crust in these active subduction-collision zones are key factors to be constrained. Mantle xenoliths entrained by Cenozoic basalts from the Indochina Block, the Sukhothai Arc and the Inthanon Zone (IB-SA-IZ) provide direct deep-seated samples of the lithospheric mantle derived from part of the Tethyan orogenic belt, offering a unique opportunity to study mantle processes during orogenesis in response to the closure of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean. The studied mantle xenoliths comprise 32 spinel lherzolites, six harzburgites, and one olivine websterite. We present a comprehensive study of the elemental geochemistry and Os isotopes of this sample suite. Their lithophile element systematics indicate that they represent mantle residues after varying degrees of melt extraction (5–24%), followed by melt refertilization. Although the highly siderophile element abundances have been affected to some extent by melt refertilization through removal of sulfides, the Os isotopic compositions of the studied xenoliths were minimally disturbed. Lherzolites and the sole olivine websterite from the IB-SA-IZ share similar Re-Os isotope systematics (187Os/188Os: 0.121–0.137) to global abyssal peridotites, representing juvenile lithospheric mantle accreted from the upwelling asthenosphere, most likely associated with arc-continent collision in response to the closure of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean and back-arc basin during the Middle-Late Triassic. In contrast, the refractory harzburgites from the Indochina Block and Sukhothai Arc are characterized by substantially lower 187Os/188Os ratios (187Os/188Os: 0.117–0.122) than the lherzolites, yielding Mesoproterozoic Re-depletion Os model ages, which can be interpreted as either ancient lithosphere relics beneath these regions or accreted ancient mantle debris from the upwelling asthenosphere. Although the interpretation for the origin of the older harzburgites is ambiguous, we can conclude that rejuvenation of the lithospheric mantle commonly occurred beneath different tectonic units of the Tethyan orogenic belt: i.e., the pre-existing lithospheric mantle beneath different tectonic units of the Tethyan orogenic belt has been largely replaced by upwelling asthenospheric mantle during the Middle-Late Triassic orogenesis. This mantle was then further refertilized to varying degrees by asthenosphere-derived melts. Both processes play key roles in defining the nature of the lithospheric mantle in orogenic settings. This study also highlights that the geodynamic processes in the lithospheric mantle beneath orogenic belts can be well constrained by integrated evidence from lithophile and highly siderophile elements and their isotopes (e.g., Os isotopes) of mantle xenoliths.