Abstract
What is styled 'dialectical logic' is commonly referred to by its apostles as if it were some kind of alternative to, or rival of, standard logic. Now indisputably there are problematic topics in the more advanced spheres of logic, as there are in mathematics; and undoubtedly logicians can make mistakes, as can mathematicians. There may well be a place for something misnamed dialectical 'logic', which is in no sense at variance with standard logic because the 'contradictions' which it highlights are in no sense logical contradictions. If formal logic, and with it the logical Law of Contradiction, is rejected, in favour of 'dialectical logic', which welcomes contradictions, the proposition, 'Logic is an instrument of domination', entails the proposition, 'Logic is not an instrument of domination', and once again precisely nothing is being asserted. Logic alone cannot possibly tell us what to believe, about adult education or anything else.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
