Reinterpretation of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Imaging Exams: Assessment of Clinical Impact, Peer Learning, and Physician Satisfaction

Abstract

To assess the impact on clinical management, potential for peer learning, and referring physician satisfaction with subspecialist reinterpretations of hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) imaging examinations. HPB CTs and MRIs from outside hospitals were reinterpreted by two subspecialty radiologists between March 2021 and August 2022. Reinterpretation reports were mailed to radiologists that issued primary reports. The electronic record was reviewed to assess for changes in clinical management based on the reinterpretations (yes/no/unavailable). To assess the potential for peer learning, a survey using a 5-point Likert scale was sent to radiologists who issued primary reports. A separate survey was sent to referring physicians to assess satisfaction with reinterpretations. Two hundred fifty imaging examinations (122 CT, 128 MRI) were reinterpreted at the request of 19 referring physicians. Ninety-sixradiologists issued primary reports. RADPEER scores 1-3 were assigned to 131/250 (52%), 86/250 (34%), and 33/250 (13%) examinations, respectively. Of 213 reinterpretations with adequate records for assessment, 75/213 (35%) were associated with a change in management; of these, 71/75 (95%) were classified as RADPEER 2 or 3. Most radiologists agreed or strongly agreed with the following: prefer to receive reinterpretations (34/36, 94%); reinterpretations changed practice of reporting HPB imaging examinations (23/36, 64%); and reinterpretations offer opportunities for peer learning (34/36, 94%). Referring physicians agreed or strongly agreed (7/7, 100%) that reinterpretations are valuable and often change or clarify management of patients with complex HPB disease,and offeran opportunity for peer learning. Radiologists and referring physicians strongly agree that HPB imaging reinterpretations help support peer learning and patient management, respectively.