Abstract

Dry matter yield and chemical composition of forage grasses harvested from an area degraded by urban solid waste deposits were evaluated. A split-plot scheme in a randomized block design with four replicates was used, with five grasses in the plots and three harvests in the subplots. The mineral content and extraction and heavy metal concentration were evaluated in the second cut, using a randomized block design with five grasses and four replicates. The grasses were Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk, Brachiaria ruziziensis, Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu and cv. Xaraés, and Panicum maximum cv. Tanzânia, cut at 42 days of regrowth. The dry matter yield per cut reached 1,480 kg ha-1; the minimum crude protein content was 9.5% and the average neutral detergent fiber content was 62.3%. The dry matter yield of grasses was satisfactory, and may be an alternative for rehabilitating areas degraded by solid waste deposits. The concentration of heavy metals in the plants was below toxicity levels; the chemical composition was appropriate, except for phosphorus. The rehabilitated areas may therefore be used for grazing.

Highlights

  • The development model in modern society generates high production and consumption levels, which cause serious basic sanitation issues, especially around household sewage and waste (Braga et al, 2002)

  • The total dry matter yield did not differ between grasses; for B. ruziziensis, Marandu, Xaraés, Tanzânia, and Basilisk, the yields were respectively 2,753.62; 3,353.62; 3,589.81; 3,444.88, and 3,610.53 kg ha-1; the overall mean was 3,350.49 kg ha-1

  • Visual observation showed that all forage grasses adequately covered the soil

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The development model in modern society generates high production and consumption levels, which cause serious basic sanitation issues, especially around household sewage and waste (Braga et al, 2002). It has been estimated that over 65% of the waste generated in Brazil is stored inadequately (IBAM, 2004). It is often impossible to fully rehabilitate an ecosystem after a first attempt; the impacting agents are mitigated initially by being covered with soil (Rovedder & Eltz, 2008). It is important to choose the right species for recovering degraded areas so that positive results are attained. These species need to be sufficiently robust to establish themselves in unfavorable environments, to compete against other species, and to develop rapidly (Dias & Griffith, 1998; Resende & Kondo, 2001).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call