Abstract

AbstractExotic conifers are rapidly spreading in many regions of New Zealand, as well as in many other countries, with detrimental impacts on both natural ecosystems and some productive sector environments. Herbicides, in particular the active ingredient triclopyr, are an important tool to manage invasive conifers, yet there is a paucity of information that quantifies the amount of herbicide required to kill trees of different sizes when applied as a basal bark treatment. Two sequential experiments were conducted to define the amount of triclopyr required to kill individual invasive lodgepole pine (Pinus contortaDouglas ex Loudon), trees of different sizes when applied in a methylated seed oil to bark (either the whole stem or base of the tree) and to determine which tree size variates (height, diameter at breast height [DBH], crown diameter [CD]) or derived attributes (crown area, crown volume index) best characterized this dose–response relationship. The outcomes of the dose–response research were compared with field operations where triclopyr was applied to the bark of trees from an aerial platform. Applying the herbicide to the whole stem, as opposed to the base of the tree only, significantly increased treatment efficacy. The tree size variates DBH, CD, crown area, and crown volume index all provided good fits to the tree mortality data, with >91% prediction accuracy. Of these variates, CD provided the most practical measure of tree size for ease of in-field calculation of dose by an operator. Herbicide rates used in field operations were seven to eight times higher than lethal doses calculated from experimental data. Our results highlight the potential for substantial reductions in herbicide rates for exotic conifer control, especially if dose–response data are combined with remotely sensed quantitative measurements of canopy area or volume using new precision technologies such as unmanned aerial vehicles.

Highlights

  • Herbicides are an important management tool for control of invasive alien plants in many regions (Douglass et al 2016; Enloe et al 2016) despite increasing social pressure to reduce their use

  • Herbicides continue to be used because they provide a cost-effective approach for removing invasive, alien plants over large areas, in terrain where manual or mechanical removal is not practical

  • All surviving trees (n = 3) occurred in the lowest dose treatment in which 9.6 g triclopyr was applied in 80 ml of product (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Herbicides are an important management tool for control of invasive alien plants in many regions (Douglass et al 2016; Enloe et al 2016) despite increasing social pressure to reduce their use. Often dose–response relationships that quantify efficacy for different herbicides are not well defined for specific invasive plants or different plant size classes, and practitioners rely on broad label recommendations and general best practice guidelines to implement control (Enloe and Kniss 2009). This approach provides reliable plant control recommendations, but it does not optimize the system and can lead to higher than necessary costs and pesticide use rates with increased potential for unintended or unnecessary off-target impacts

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call