Abstract
The cutoff for dilated mid-ascending aorta (mAA) is controversial and has several definitions. The present study was carried out to determine the prevalence of mAA dilation based on published definitions and to identify the optimal cutoff. Echocardiographic studies of patients >15years of age performed at a large tertiary care center over 4years, n = 49,330, were retrospectively evaluated. Leading-edge-to-leading-edge technique was used to measure the mAA in diastole. Several cutoff criteria were included. In addition, we defined normals in our database as those who, after 28 causes of dilated aorta were excluded, were normal both clinically and echocardiographically (n = 2334). The mean age was 64.2 ± 17.1years, and 31.5% were men. The prevalence of dilated mAA based on absolute criteria with sex stratification varied between 17% and 23% and based on relative criteria (to age, body surface area, and sex) varied between 6% and 11%. It further decreased to 7.6% on the addition of narrow age stratification (10year intervals) performed on normals in our database. The multivariate adjusted R2 (for variation in mAA diameter) was 0.25 for age, decreasing to 0.12 for weight and 0.07 for sex and height. The lowest prevalence of 7.6% probably represents the optimal cutoff for dilated mAA because it includes age, which explains most of the variation in mAA, in narrow (10year) intervals only performed in our normals, which represents the largest sample size to date.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call