Abstract
Objectives(1) To create predictive nomograms for the dominant and nondominant limbs on the Lower Extremity Motor Coordination Test (LEMOCOT) using reference values, and (2) to determine the inter- and intrarater reliability for the LEMOCOT; the best scoring method (first vs mean of the first 2 vs mean of the last 2 vs mean of 3 vs the highest of 3 trials); the best testing method (direct vs video observation); and the ability to detect real change (smallest real difference [SRD] and standard error of the measurement [SEM]). DesignNormative and methodological study. SettingMetropolitan area. ParticipantsHealthy individuals (N=320, 50% women) in 7 age groups: 20 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, 70 to 79, and ≥80 years. Each group had 50 participants, except for ≥80 years (n=20). InterventionsNot applicable. Main Outcome MeasureLEMOCOT. ResultsAge and sex explained 48% of the variance in the LEMOCOT scores for the dominant limb and 44% for the nondominant limb (125<F<148; P<.001). No significant differences were found regarding the different scoring methods (.12<F<1.02; .10<P<.92), and all of them demonstrated good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients between .90 and .99; P<.001). There was agreement between scores from direct and video observation (limits of agreement −1.99 to 1.85; −1.55 to 1.62). Appropriate SEM (2.27–1.85) and SRD (6.27–5.11) values were found. ConclusionsReference values were determined for the LEMOCOT, and predictive nomograms were created based on age and sex. The LEMOCOT is reliable, needing only 1 trial (after familiarization) to generate reliable scores; can be scored from either direct or video observation; and has the ability to detect real change over time.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call