Abstract

Dullinger et al. (Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 110:7342–7347, 2013) showed that current proportions of threatened species in European countries are more correlated to socio-economic pressures calculated a century ago than to current socio-economic pressures. These results could have important impacts on future political decisions, yet the statistical analyses used may be strongly impacted by pseudo-replication and over-dispersion of data. I reanalysed Dullinger et al.’s data using generalised linear mixed models accounting for pseudo-replication and over-dispersion. These new statistical models indicated that socio-economic pressures had a much less clear impact on proportions of threatened species than indicated by Dullinger et al. In many cases, the effects of socio-economic pressures even vanished. Dullinger et al. (Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 110:7342–7347, 2013)’s results are actually much less “considerable” than their paper implies and therefore should be viewed with caution. Ecologists should more often incorporate pseudo-replication and overdispersion in their statistical analyses.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.