Abstract

Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis are important tools in the modelling process: they assign confidence to model results, can aid in focusing monitoring and preservation efforts, and can be used in model simplification. A weakness of global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis methodologies is the often subjective definition of prior parameter probability distributions, especially in data-poor areas. We apply Monte Carlo filtering in conjunction with quantitative variance-based global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis techniques to address this weakness and define parameter probability distributions in the absence of measured data. This general methodology is applied to a reservoir model of the Okavango Delta, Botswana. In addition to providing a methodology for setting prior parameter distributions, results show that the use of Monte Carlo filtering reduces model uncertainty and produces simulations that better represent the calibrated ranges. Thus, Monte Carlo filtering increases the accuracy and precision of parametric model uncertainty. Results also show that the most important parameters in our model are the volume thresholds, the reservoir area/volume coefficient, floodplain porosity, and the island extinction coefficient. The reservoir representing the central part of the wetland, where flood waters separate into several independent distributaries, is a keystone area within the model. These results identify critical areas and parameters for monitoring and managing, refine and reduce input/output uncertainty, and present a transferable methodology for developing parameter probability distribution functions, especially when using empirical models in data-scarce areas. Keywords : sensitivity analysis, uncertainty analysis, Monte Carlo filtering, reservoir model, Okavango Delta

Highlights

  • Global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis (GSA/UA) systematically and quantitatively investigates input/output uncertainties to assess a model’s reliability (Scott, 1996; Saltelli et al, 2008) and can be used to assign confidence to model results

  • The model produced a monthly inundation area that compares to observed data with a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 528 km2 and a correlation coefficient of 0.90 for the entire Delta (Wolski et al, 2006)

  • The objective function for our study was defined as the Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency (NSE) (Nash and Sutcliffe, 1970), which was applied to quantify the degree of matching between the monthly inundated area of the entire Delta that was obtained in the original calibration model runs (Wolski et al, 2006) and our uncertainty analysis runs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis (GSA/UA) systematically and quantitatively investigates input/output uncertainties to assess a model’s reliability (Scott, 1996; Saltelli et al, 2008) and can be used to assign confidence to model results. Global uncertainty analysis (GUA) quantifies total model uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis (GSA) apportions that uncertainty to each of the parameters While these are two separate methods with different objectives, the overlap between them is important. These interactions may not be obvious and may have significant impacts on the model output due to their non-additive nature (Saltelli et al, 2008). For all of these reasons, GSA/UA is a crucial step in the modelling process

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call