Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of reduced stocking density in combination with provision of additional enrichment material on pig welfare on-farm. On three growing-finishing farms in Austria, in total 974, 413, and 70 pigs were kept at 1 m2/pig and straw or hay in a rack as additional enrichment material (improved pens, IP; n = 6–38 pens per farm) or in pens complying with the minimum legal requirements of 0.7 m2/pig (control pens, CP; n = 6–37 pens per farm). Behavior as well as skin, tail and ear lesions and pig soiling were assessed at the beginning and in the middle of the fattening period, while performance data were recorded at the end of the fattening period. Data analysis was performed for each farm separately using generalized linear and linear mixed models or Mann-Whitney U-Test. Pigs in IP less frequently manipulated pen mates' ears (Farm 1: = 0.002; Farm 2: P = 0.002) and body (Farm 1: P = 0.021; Farm 2: P = 0.015) than in CP. Prevalence of skin, tail and ear lesions and soiled pigs did not differ between treatments. In only one farm, average daily weight gain was higher in IP than in CP (Farm 1: P = 0.003). Our findings indicate that increased space allowance and provision of substrate can improve aspects of animal welfare within existing pig fattening systems, without requiring irreversible constructional modifications to the system.

Highlights

  • For labor and cost efficiency reasons, in most European countries fattening pigs are kept indoors under controlled climatic conditions with high stocking densities and fully slatted floors

  • More agonistic interactions were observed in control pens (CP) than in improved pens (IP) (P = 0.007)

  • The number of tail and ear biting incidences as well as agonistic interactions was higher in CP than in IP (P = 0.033, P = 0.002 and P = 0.005, respectively)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For labor and cost efficiency reasons, in most European countries fattening pigs are kept indoors under controlled climatic conditions with high stocking densities and fully slatted floors. The barren environment together with a lack of exploratory material promotes the development of behavioral disorders such as tail and ear biting with detrimental effects on animal welfare and economic performance [4, 5]. Tail and ear biting are multifactorial behavioral disorders caused by numerous internal (e.g., genetic predisposition, sex) and external (e.g., group size, floor type, feeder space, temperature) risk factors, which makes control and prevention demanding [4, 6].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call