Reduced Risk of Revision with Computer-Guided Versus Non-Computer-Guided THA: An Analysis of Manufacturer-Specific Data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.

Abstract

Background:Computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) is known to improve implantation precision, but clinical data demonstrating an improvement in survivorship and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are lacking. Our aim was to compare the risk of revision, PROMs, and patient satisfaction between cohorts who underwent THA with and without the use of computer guidance.Methods:We used the data set and linked PROM data of the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. Our sample included THAs performed for osteoarthritis using cementless acetabular components from a single manufacturer (cementless and hybrid THAs). An additional analysis was performed limiting the sample size to cementless-only THAs. The primary end point was revision (any component) for any reason. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis and an adjusted Cox proportional-hazards model were used.Results:There were 41,683 non-computer-guided and 871 (2%) computer-guided cases included in our analysis of the cementless and hybrid group. There were 943 revisions in the non-computer-guided group and 7 in the computer-guided group. The cumulative revision rate at 10 years was 3.88% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.59% to 4.18%) for the non-computer-guided group and 1.06% (95% CI: 0.45% to 2.76%) for the computer-guided group. The Cox proportional-hazards model yielded a hazard ratio of 0.45 (95% CI: 0.21 to 0.96; p = 0.038). In the analysis of the cementless-only group, the cumulative revision rate at 10 years was 3.99% (95% CI: 3.62% to 4.38%) and 1.20% (95% CI: 0.52% to 3.12%) for the 2 groups, respectively. The Cox proportional-hazards model yielded a hazard ratio of 0.47 (95% CI: 0.22 to 1.01; p = 0.053). There was no significant difference in the 6-month Oxford Hip Score, the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) and EQ-VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) scores, and patient-reported success rates. Patient satisfaction (single-item satisfaction outcome measure) was higher in the computer-guided group, but this finding was limited by a reduced number of responses.Conclusions:In our analysis, the use of computer-guided surgery was associated with a lower rate of revision at mean follow-up of 5.6 years. This finding was upheld when the sample was restricted to cementless-only THAs. Causality cannot be inferred in view of the observational nature of the study, and additional studies are recommended to validate these findings.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.