Abstract
The multiple evolutionary transitions from radial to bilateral flower symmetry recorded across the angiosperms have been related to pollinator specialization and the promotion of outcross pollen transfer. In particular, the limited number of physical orientations associated with bilaterality results in a tighter morphological match between a flower and its specialized pollinators, which can enhance the transfer of incoming pollen while preventing autonomous, or even pollinator-mediated self-pollination when associated with dichogamy. In contrast, radial flowers have various planes of symmetry, which may allow pollination by a wider range of pollinators at the cost of more promiscuous pollen transfer. Here we used data from the literature and our own on pollen production, ovule production, and stigmatic pollen load compiled for 171 angiosperm species distributed worldwide to assess differences in pollen transfer in relation to flower symmetry within a phylogenetic comparative framework. We did not find evidence that bilateral and radial flowers differ in average pollen and ovule production. However, bilateral flowers tended to receive less pollen on their stigmas. This decrease in pollen receipt was most apparent among self-compatible species after accounting for the covarying effects of flower size and ovule production. Therefore, our findings indicate that the evolution of flower bilaterality, a trait we found is strongly associated with self-compatibility, comes at a quantitative pollination cost. However, they support the view that a bilateral flower morphology may provide the benefit of limiting self-pollen deposition, particularly in the absence of an alternative mechanism of selfing avoidance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.