Abstract
ABSTRACTWhile evidence suggests that warming may impact cognition of ectotherms, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. A possible but rarely considered mechanism is that the metabolic response of ectotherms to warming is associated with changes in brain morphology and function. Here, we compared aerobic metabolism, brain volume, boldness and accuracy of maze solving of common minnows (Phoxinus phoxinus) acclimated for 8 months to either their current optimal natural (14°C) or warm (20°C) water temperature. Metabolic rates indicated increased energy expenditure in warm-acclimated fish, but also at least partial thermal compensation as warm-acclimated fish maintained high aerobic scope. Warm-acclimated fish had larger brains than cool-acclimated fish. The volume of the dorsal medulla relative to the overall brain size was larger in warm- than in cool-acclimated fish, but the proportion of other brain regions did not differ between the temperature treatments. Warm-acclimated fish did not differ in boldness but made more errors than cool-acclimated fish in exploring the maze across four trials. Inter-individual differences in the number of exploration errors were repeatable across the four trials of the maze test. Our findings suggest that in warm environments, maintaining a high aerobic scope, which is important for the performance of physically demanding tasks, can come at the cost of changes in brain morphology and impairment of the capacity to explore novel environments. This trade-off could have strong fitness implications for wild ectotherms.
Highlights
Our study shows that warming can reduce the capacity of fish to explore novel environments, possibly as a result of the deterioration of short-term working spatial memory (Hughes and Blight, 1999) rather than differences in spatial learning skills (Braithwaite, 2005)
Inter-individual differences in the number of exploration errors during the maze test were repeatable, but we observed no difference in the number of errors between the first and the last round of the maze test, indicating that in both treatments fish did not learn to locate the reward from previous trials
Boldness score was not associated with the number of exploration errors, which does not support the finding of previous
Summary
There is currently a scarcity of studies testing the effect of warm acclimation on brain volume and its regions and the consequences of such changes on the capacity of fish to explore novel environments. We found that warm-acclimated fish had significantly larger FL at tagging (F1,61=8.4332, P=0.0153), but there was no significant difference in FL between the temperature treatments at the time of the metabolic assays (F1,61=2.0366, P=0.1586), or at the end of the experiment (F1,64=3.7176, P=0.0875; Fig. S1B).
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have