Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with recurrent short interpregnancy interval (IPI) in women in their third delivery. MethodsA retrospective computerized database study of all women who delivered their first three consecutive deliveries in a single tertiary medical center over 20 years (1999–2019). Maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with recurrent short IPI (<6 months between the 1st and 2nd pregnancy and the 2nd and 3rd pregnancy) were compared to women with recurrent optimal IPI (18–48 months), and to women with a single short IPI (<6 months between the 1st and 2nd pregnancy followed by an optimal IPI of 18–48 months between the 2nd and 3rd pregnancy). Additionally, in the recurrent short IPI groups, outcomes of the 2nd and 3rd pregnancies were compared in order to achieve an ideal adjustment to background characteristics. Univariate analysis was followed by multiple logistic regression models; adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. ResultsDuring the study period 10,569 women had three consecutive deliveries at our medical center, of those 338 (3.2%) women had recurrent short IPIs, and 1,021 (9.7%) had recurrent optimal IPIs. Recurrent short IPI was associated with a significantly higher risk of maternal anemia (Hb < 10gr%) on admission to labor (aOR 3.4 [95% CI 1.09–10.65], p = 0.04) and higher risk of small for gestational age neonates (aOR 10.4 [95% CI 2.32–46.93], p < 0.01), as compared with women with recurrent optimal IPI and significantly higher rates of low neonatal birth weights (2500 gr) and anemia (Hb < 10gr%) alongside lower rates of operative vaginal deliveries as compared with women with single short IPI followed by an optimal IPI. In the recurrent short IPI groups, the 3rd deliveries had significantly higher rates of in-labor cesarean and anemia (Hb < 10gr%) on admission as compared to their 2nd deliveries. ConclusionRecurrent short IPI is associated with maternal anemia and small for gestational age neonates. Guiding patients towards prolongation of the IPI should include explanatory comments on these outcomes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.