Abstract

ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate differences by recruitment method in the characteristics of participants who are considering abortion. Study designBetween June 2021 and April 2022, we recruited pregnant people considering abortion in Indiana from (1) online posts, (2) abortion funds, and (3) abortion clinics. We compared participant characteristics reported in an online survey by recruitment source. ResultsCompared to those recruited from clinics (n = 94), participants recruited online (n = 84) and through abortion funds (n = 239) were later in their pregnancy, were already parenting, received less formal education, struggled financially, and were more likely to be Black or African American, queer, transgender, or nonbinary. ConclusionsRecruitment from online sources and abortion funds reaches more people who face greater barriers to abortion care than recruitment from clinics. ImplicationsAugmenting clinic-based recruitment with online and abortion fund recruitment could capture a more complete sample of people considering abortion.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call