Abstract

Purpose The article addresses how a reduction in the number of regional airports in Norway can improve the air transport services currently characterized by expensive fares, high operating costs and leakage of passengers to larger airports. Methods Traffic and economic consequences of such structural changes are discussed referring to a case from Northern Norway in which plans exist to replace three regional airports with one larger airport. The welfare consequences are assessed using cost-benefit analysis. Results The large airport is expected to remove the need for state-subsidized flights (PSO-routes), reduce security upgrade costs, offer passengers lower fares and increase the number of domestic direct flights, as well as being profitable from a welfare perspective. Conclusions When airports are closed down municipalities must be compensated for the loss of their local airports by building alternative transport infrastructure to make this politically acceptable. It is important to bear in mind that too strong a reduction of the number of airports may weaken parts of the established hub- and spoke system, and could therefore lead to reduced service at existing hubs.

Highlights

  • The importance of airports for regional development has been studied in several countries mainly focusing on economic growth [1, 2]

  • At the time of construction it was decided to establish the regional airports for operation by Short Take-Off and Landing (STOL) planes

  • Air travel surveys show that almost 50% of the passengers between the main airport in Oslo and this region chose to travel from the nearest large airport rather than the closest regional airport [13]

Read more

Summary

Methods

Traffic and economic consequences of such structural changes are discussed referring to a case from Northern Norway in which plans exist to replace three regional airports with one larger airport.

Results
Conclusions
Introduction
The airport structure
Challenges for the regional airports in Norway
Fare level and route services
Subsidised PSO-operations and airport deficits
Are fewer airports the solution?
The Helgeland case
Airport structure and air route services
Infrastructure improvements
Increased user benefits
The consequences of a joint airport
Influence on airline companies
Impact on operating costs for airport owner
Profitability from a welfare perspective
Regional effects
Alternative use of aviation subsidies
Conclusions and implications

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.