Abstract
The institutional framework of entitlements set forth by the Endangered Species Act (ESA) has played an unintended but significant role in hampering species recovery efforts. Whereas the ESA explicitly designates the rights and duties of individuals and government agencies with regard to the protection of listed species, it leaves the implementation of recovery efforts largely to the discretion of the landowner. Such a designation of rights creates numerous perverse incentives that hinder the implementation of recovery efforts. Flexible incentive programs could be used to address this gap in endangered species conservation by rewarding the implementation of recovery efforts of private landowners. Research into the human dimensions of species recovery would allow the formulation of policies and incentives designed to reduce the barriers to species recovery and take advantage of the positive attitudes much of the public has of the intrinsic value of species.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.