Applying Reiss’ expectancy theory to locals’ perceptions of a potential red wolf reintroduction to Ozark National Forest, AR

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although perceptions of risk related to wildlife have been well-studied, little research has evaluated the root causes of these perceived risks. Using a semi-structured instrument, we interviewed 20 interested parties who reside and/or recreate near Ozark National Forest, Arkansas, to explore perceptions of a potential red wolf (Canis rufus) reintroduction to the region. We employed Reiss’ (1991) expectancy theory to identify cause and effect relationships between previous conditioning events interested parties had experienced (i.e. sensitivities) and perceived risks related to the reintroduction (i.e. expectancies). We found respondents drew parallels to previous events including the red wolf reintroduction to North Carolina, other wildlife reintroductions in Arkansas, gray wolf (Canis lupus) reintroductions in Yellowstone National Park, and conflicts with other wildlife in Arkansas, where distrust for wildlife agencies underpinned these experiences. Based on our findings, we recommend agencies preemptively build trust and practice clear and frequent communication among interested parties when reintroductions are being considered.