Abstract
In the current era, the survival of extremely low-birth-weight infants has increased considerably because of new advances in technology; however, these infants often develop chronic dysfunction of the lung, which is called bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). BPD remains an important cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity despite newer and gentler modes of ventilation. BPD results from the exposure of immature lungs to various antenatal and postnatal factors that lead to an impairment in lung development and aberrant growth of lung parenchyma and vasculature. However, we still struggle with a uniform definition for BPD that can help predict various short- and long-term pulmonary outcomes. With new research, our understanding of the pathobiology of this disease has evolved, and many new mechanisms of lung injury and repair are now known. By utilizing the novel ‘omic’ approaches in BPD, we have now identified various factors in the disease process that may act as novel therapeutic targets in the future. New investigational agents being explored for the management and prevention of BPD include mesenchymal stem cell therapy and insulin-like growth factor 1. Despite this, many questions remain unanswered and require further research to improve the outcomes of premature infants with BPD.
Highlights
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) was described as a new lung disease in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) by Northway et al, in 19671
BPD continues to be a major cause of respiratory morbidities in the modern era as we push the limits of viability and see increased survival of extremely preterm infants born at 22–24 weeks of gestation[6]
We discuss the new advances in understanding the pathobiology of this disease, the current controversy regarding the definition of BPD, use of the novel “omic” approaches in BPD, and how this affects our assessment of this disease
Summary
Faculty Reviews are review articles written by the prestigious Members of Faculty Opinions. The articles are commissioned and peer reviewed before publication to ensure that the final, published version is comprehensive and accessible. The reviewers who approved the final version are listed with their names and affiliations. Any comments on the article can be found at the end of the article
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have